The motivating factor for historical change in the Stern
book is economics and this was also discussed in class. I agree with this because the reason that the
conquest occurred in the first place was to find wealth for those that were not
lucky enough to find it in the mother country of Spain. It is the search for wealth that led to the
discoveries of the varying empires such as the Aztec, the Inca, and the
Maya. As stern writes, “an insatiable
thirst for the money-commodities (i.e., precious metals), and the hope to make
money ‘work’ or grow now captivated a spreading entrepreneurial imagination.” The reason the Spanish decided to stay and
attempt to rule these native people was because they wanted wealth, they
searched for gold, silver, and precious stones.
Their intentions were not to make peaceful contact and understand these
civilizations, their culture, their origins, or their religion but to use the
knowledge these people had of their land in order to find the gold. The labor systems that are discussed by Stern
rose because of the greedy conquistadors, elite Spaniards, elite Indians, and
their ambition for wealth or their economic wellbeing. Some of these labor systems are the encomienda,
wage labor, and debt peonage with some of these, as we discussed in class, may
fall under slavery or have some characteristics of slavery. The conquest became
a conquest because the motivation for its beginning was economic, to get rich,
to find land, to find gold, and to ascend the social hierarchy many could not
achieve in Spain. If the motivating factor
would have been scientific, artistic, philosophical, or anthropological then
the conquest could have been an exploration, an expedition of these foreign
lands and amazing civilizations and not a conquest. History would have taken a different turn if
the motivating factor had been other than economic.
I completely agree with your post because there was a huge greed involved in part of the Spaniards, but if you look at it closer, governance was the most important towards the end. If you look at Velázquez and Corés rivalry in Restall's book, they were both in search for the conquering license in order to get governance. Another scenario that depicts the greediness is how Pizarro had Almagro executed in 1537 and four years later Almagro's son had Pizarro assassinated.(Restall, 21) I agree it was gold that motivated the conquest of the Americas, but it later evolved into a fight for governance.
ReplyDelete