Conrad
and Demarest speak about the ideology that surrounded the religion of the
Mexica and Inca people. We have explored this term known as ideology in depth
in class, and the definition that has stuck with me from the class discussion
is that ideology is a set of ideas that are taken as truth by its supporters.
Although people in the 21st century might find human sacrifices as
inhumane, the people of Mexica and Incan background saw it as part of their
religion. The authors define ideology as “a set of interrelated ideas that
provides the members of a group with rationale or their existence.” (4) It is
interesting that they point out that the Mesoamerican and Central Andean
civilizations’ ideologies were profoundly rooted in religion. In this
particular instance, these terms are interchangeable in the sense that these
civilizations’ beliefs and actions were embedded in their religion. Therefore,
these empires believed the truth to be these religious ideas that defined the
day to day activities of the people. All in all, the book’s introduction took
the same structure as our course, as both the book and course defined the terms
that we would be using throughout both experiences to clear the ambiguities
that may have existed otherwise.
I found
it interesting how the authors addressed the empires that had preceded the
Aztecs while also mentioning that the chronological aspects of these events are
controversial in the sense that it is difficult to figure out when they
actually occurred. This is due to the many different sources that are used to
recount the history and even to the different methods of calendric systems that
might have been used. This is another relation that I found to our class, as we
discussed primary and secondary sources and their impact that they have on how
a story is retold. It is essential to understand what types of sources are
being relied upon when a person is explaining historical discourse.
Although it can be difficult to
actually know what truly happened in some cases, it is clear that these empires
utilized religion ideology as their backbone to control the subordinate groups.
The authors explore how this has been a reoccurring
theme throughout the empires that preceded the Aztecs and the Incas. One
particular example is found in the Toltec empire where the elite group
professed their ancestry to legitimize their rule. This continued through the
Aztec and Inca rule, as the leaders would claim ancestry of gods and even past
empire rulers to legitimize their own power. It is interesting how some aspects
of this religious ideology that affected these empires in an astronomical way
were carried on from past empires. The leaders understood the power that these
ideologies held and the importance, as well, that these ideologies be held
intact. This in itself speaks volumes on ideology and its substantive nature
that it held in these civilizations.
I find it very interesting that you bring up the fact that religion and society function as one intertwined unit in the Aztec empire. I feel that we now look as the Aztec rituals and customs more as a integral part of their culture and less a form of barbarism. Human sacrifice was essential to their everyday lives. They depended on the sun for nourishment for their crops (corn). This is a logical argument for the support of human sacrifice in the Aztec Empire. However, I find it interesting that the Spanish used similar ideological concepts the fueled their empire as well.
ReplyDeleteThe Catholic Church was a strong influence on the Spanish monarchs, and most of Europe. When we read Restall in class many of peers saw the actions of the Spanish as silly and for the lack of a better word, stupid. On page 68 Restall states, “ the pope presided over a Castilian-Portuguese treaty that divided the Americas, still a largely imagined region, between the two kingdoms. Thus, in effect, Spaniards were the recipients of a divine grant of lands and peoples…” The Spanish truly believed that God gave these lands to them. After all, the Pope (Gods voice on earth) told the Spaniards that the Americas was theirs for the taking.
I believe that viewing history in retrospect is detrimental to the way we perceive history. Our judgments are clouded by bias and current knowledge. To truly understand how and why people function in a particular manner we must first view history through the eyes of the people that lived it. When you said, “these empires believed the truth to be these religious ideas that defined the day to day activities of the people,” I think we should try to apply this not just to the Aztec Empire, but to all Empires/ Societies that differ from our own.