One of Conrad and Demarest’s main
objective is, in my opinion, to debunk the myth that Cortes and his couple
hundred men marched in and crushed the Aztec empire. There is a common belief
that Cortes almost singlehandedly defeated the Aztec empire, which consisted of
uncivilized and peaceful peoples. Conrad and Demarest discuss in great detail
the complex and sophisticated culture of the Mexica and their rise to power
within the Triple Alliance. Their intricate class structure of the pipiltin and macehualtin (nobility and commoners) was far from uncivilized. The
Aztecs had established a hierarchy within the different classes, even the pochteca merchants. This social
structure, one could argue, does not only show that the natives were civilized
but were more urbane than that of their Spanish invaders.
The Aztec empire, Conrad and
Demarest argue, was doomed from the start. Their principal goals were “food for
the gods [Tenochtitlan] and tribute for the state.” Conrad and Demarest
continue, “The Mexica were unprepared to face the long-term problems of governing
and controlling the subjugated peoples.” (p.53) It was this “flawed system” that
would ultimately destroy the empire. Imperial soldiers would have to reconquer
subjugated people over and over. They did not try to consolidate their power.
Rather, they were systematically programed to conquer, take captives, sacrifice
and continue. This cycle was not objected to until Moctezuma II tried to alter
the internal structure of the empire. However, by that time it was too late.
The Spanish simply arrived at the right time to rally the Aztec enemies
(Tlaxcalans etc.) and finish off the empire, which was probably going to
collapse anyway. “As the Spaniards arrived” Conrad and Demarest conclude, “the
Aztec empire was being strangled by the very forces that had created it.”
I enjoyed the fact that Conrad and Demarest went into great detail to explain the different culture and "stick up" for the indigenous. Coming from a European civilization, the Spanish obviously were greatly appalled by what they observed. As described by a Spanish monk that accompanied Cortes's troops stated, "Then the man or woman, having been killed in this fashion (taking out the heart of said "victim") was thrown down the steps, them roasted in clay ovens and eaten as a very tender delicacy; and this is the way they made their sacrifices to their gods." As you had stated that Conrad and Demarest try to debunk the Cortes myth, I believe that this should have been one of the myths that Restall should have went into more depth with: the fact that the sacrificial ceremonies, although horrendous to the Christian faith and many European cultures, were not barbaric in the eyes of the indigenous but rather spiritual and traditional.
ReplyDelete