In chapter four, Restall provides
seven "aspects" to a conquest completion myth. Within the seven aspects, Restall reveals evidence
that not only questions the rapidity of the Conquest, but also its conclusion. Perhaps the most intriguing evidence for the
Conquest's incompleteness is Restall's third aspect. The historical record reveals native revolts
in the wake of the Conquest. Restall
appears to suggest that these native revolts could have been the ongoing
Conquest itself (72). This aspect, taken
together with the known royal benefits to conquistadors for a quick conquest completion,
calls into question the rapidity and completion of the Conquest.
The notion of the Spanish being the
sole conquistadors of Mesoamerica and the Andes is addressed in chapter
three. I found elements of this myth the
most surprising. After studying the
colonization of North American, I was not surprised to read that the Spanish,
like the English in North America, sought native allies in their endeavors.
However, the role of Africans and African slaves in the Conquest was surprising.
The fact that Africans Juan Valiente and
Juan Beltrán earned an encomienda, a
prize highly valued by Spanish conquistadors, reveals their major role in the
Conquest. Clearly, the Spanish did not
act alone in the Conquest.
I definitely agree with you on the historical aspect of African American peoples playing such a large role in the conquests AND, like you pointed out, earning some of the same rewards as the conquistadors. Even though the Age of Discovery was at the "beginning" of the infamous slave trade and ethnocentrism was already becoming a strong idea, the fact that these men, especially the two you point out, could essentially go on their own conquests. Fascinating from a social perspective. I'm excited to read more.
ReplyDelete